<html><head><meta name="color-scheme" content="light dark"></head><body><pre style="word-wrap: break-word; white-space: pre-wrap;">\def\rr{\color{red}}
\def\gr{\color{green}}
\def\mm{\color{magenta}}
\def\bb{\color{blue}}
\def\bw{\color{black}}

\def\({ \left( }
\def\){ \right) }
\def\b{\begin{equation}}
\def\e{\end{equation}}
\def\bi{\begin{itemize}}
\def\ei{\end{itemize}}
\def\bt{\vskip.1in \begin{tabular}}
\def\et{\end{tabular} \vskip.1in}
\def\={\ =\ }
\def\ap{\ \approx\ }
\def\+{\ +\ }
\def\-{\ -\ }
\def\lc{\ell_c}
\def\Ls{\cal L \rm}
\def\ls{\cal l \rm}
\def\E{\cal E \rm}
\def\mumu{$\mu^+\mu^-$}
\def\ee{$e^+e^-$}
\def\betav{\beta_v}
\def\betac{\beta}
\def\betamax{\beta^*_{max}}
\def\betamin{\beta^*_{min}}
\def\lc{\ell_c}
\def\chih{\chi_{1/2}}
\def\delchi{\Delta\chi}
\def\Ls{\cal L \rm}
\def\ls{\cal l \rm}
\def\Es{\cal E \rm}

\def\sub{\LARGE \bf}
\def\head{\Huge \bf \rr}
\def\app{$\approx$}
\def\ben{\begin{enumerate}}
\def\een{\end{enumerate}}




\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{pst-all}
\usepackage{color}
\begin{document}

{\rr\huge Early Example}

The following table summarizes the the results from the plot that follows.

Note that the text following the figure is no longer relevant. It could be replaced by:

" It is seen that mostparameters are reasonable, but the Distortion is so large without surface tension (423\%) that the calculation is clearly invalid. Even with surface tension included, the distortion (up to 26\% dx/r) is larger than the assumptions of the calcualtion allow. It is thus unclear whether the jet would be usable with such parameters. The problem is removed, if the jet is placed inside the magnetic field."

 \begin{tabular}{|ccccccc|}
 \hline
 $B_z$ &amp; $\Delta p$ &amp; $&lt; \Delta v&gt;$ &amp; $\hat{ \Delta v}$ &amp; $\Delta y$ &amp; $\Delta x$/r&amp;$\Delta x$/r\\
&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;No ST&amp;\\
 T     &amp;  Atm.   &amp;      m/s    &amp;          m/s           &amp;   mm        &amp;    \%  &amp;\%\\
 \hline
 0.077 &amp;-0.245 &amp;-0.125 &amp; -5.542 &amp;-.060 &amp;0.0 &amp;26\\
  20.0 &amp;0.351 &amp;.000 &amp;.000 &amp;0.045 &amp; 423 &amp;-21\\
 %0.125 &amp;5.542 &amp;0.060 &amp; 423 &amp;\\
 \hline
 \end{tabular}

\newpage

\input{jetk1.fig}

\newpage

{\rr\huge Study II Example with vel=20 m/s}

These are the limits taken from the following plot.

Note this is the plot I gave you before, but I note now that it is for 20 m/s, where we had assumed 30 m/s in the paper. I will include this again, but then add a new one for 30 m/s which might be better to use.

 \begin{tabular}{|ccccccc|}
 \hline
 $B_z$ &amp; $\Delta p$ &amp; $&lt; \Delta v&gt;$ &amp; $\hat{ \Delta v}$ &amp; $\Delta y$ &amp; $\Delta x$/r&amp;$\Delta x$/r\\
&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;No ST&amp;\\
 T     &amp;  Atm.   &amp;      m/s    &amp;          m/s           &amp;   mm        &amp;    \%  &amp;\%\\
\hline
  18.8 &amp;-0.16 &amp;-0.0 &amp;-0.41 &amp;0.0 &amp;0.0 &amp;0.0\\
  20.0 &amp;0.16 &amp;0.058 &amp;-.019 &amp;0.007 &amp;0.56 &amp;0.22\\
 %0.058 &amp;0.409 &amp;0.007 &amp;0.558 &amp;\\
 \hline
 \end{tabular}

\newpage

\input{jet20.fig}

\newpage
{\rr\huge Study II Example with vel=30 m/s}

These are the limits taken from the following plot.

Note: this now agrees with the text of the paper, with the addition of the \% on the last item.

\begin{tabular}{|ccccccc|}
 \hline
 $B_z$ &amp; $\Delta p$ &amp; $&lt; \Delta v&gt;$ &amp; $\hat{ \Delta v}$ &amp; $\Delta y$ &amp; $\Delta x$/r&amp;$\Delta x$/r\\
&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;&amp;No ST&amp;\\
 T     &amp;  Atm.   &amp;      m/s    &amp;          m/s           &amp;   mm        &amp;    \%  &amp;\%\\
\hline
18.8 &amp;-0.240 &amp;0.0 &amp;-.41 &amp;0.0 &amp;0.0 &amp;0.0\\
20.0 &amp;0.245 &amp;0.058 &amp;-.019 &amp;0.005 &amp;0.37 &amp;0.18\\
 \hline
 \end{tabular}

\newpage
\input{jet30.fig}

\end{document}</pre></body></html>